Denver DNC is the realization of George Orwell's nightmare

The videographer inquires at the police line, "why are we being contained?"

The policeman gestures upward with his automatic weapon as he responds, "you're not, you can leave." *

But the detainees are surrounded by overwhelming force, and there is no escape. A similar question at a different point in the line will elicit a similar response. To any free spirit trapped behind the lines, the tone is mocking, dismissive. To the protesters, journalists, and legal observers, the message is clear: your government's intent to control ideology is every bit as absolute as is its monopoly on force. As minutes pass into hours, the lesson becomes its own form of punishment.

In the streets of Denver, we have witnessed the systematic criminalization of any ideology that is not mainstream. If you dare to exercise free speech in the streets, then your government will make that the battleground between mainstream and "corrupting" ideas.

Political speech may be free when restricted to the realm of thought, but in this society, political speech is not free in the dimension of cost. Your "aberrant" ideology comes with a price which you will pay, personally. Via police phalanxes administering pepper spray and batons, via random, unprovoked arrests and the humiliation of detainees, the police force becomes the instrument of instruction: you are slaves to the system, and if you rebel, your dissidence will be punished.

Some will argue that the police were doing a necessarily brutal job, that it was important to exhibit overwhelming force in order to prevent anarchists from damaging property. This is property-above-people fetishism; it asserts that the broken heads of many innocent activists, journalists, and bystanders are preferable to the mere possibility of broken windows. (Someone who was involved with the planning sessions relates to me that there was never a plan to break windows. The experience of the previous day, when anarchists escaped the cordons and broke free in a march that they later described as exhilarating, suggests that property damage was not their goal.)

The standoff, in which the Denver police corralled an entire protest march into "pens" of heavily armored police lines reinforced by cavalry and armored vehicles, was broadcast to the world via the Denver Post's streaming video, and by other means. Its significance will likely be debated for years to come. To those of us who were in one way or another involved, it reinforces the conviction that when it comes to issues that really matter, there is little difference between the two mainstream parties.

The mayor of Denver is a Democrat. The Governor of Colorado is a Democrat. This was a confrontation at the convention of Barak Obama's party, and he cannot have been oblivious. His interest should have been felt personally. If Barak Obama was really one of the people, he would have dropped whatever he was doing Monday night and flown to Denver. The Barak of the people would have walked through the ranks of heavily armed soldiers, past the cadres of cossacks and the armored vehicles, and he would have offered some of his magical phrases to calm the jets on both sides. It is the dilemma of our society that in doing so, he would have dismissed any chance that he would take office next January. Even as he identified himself with the plight of the people in the street, he would have signified to the party that he was no longer mainstream.

As in Mao's Hundred Flowers Campaign, the state allows you certain freedoms, then attempts to crush the spirit that animates such free thinking. Any deviance from mainstream acceptance is to be punished with political failure. But if you go too far, (i.e., take to the streets) then you face imprisonment, humiliation, beatings. Implicit in the message is the Orwellian concept that your government knows best; it is good for you to acknowledge this, even if the government must force you to such an understanding.

* The words are verbatim from Aaron Cantrell's video

Just a couple of thoughts

Dear Richard

First I'd like to say good work. An excellent article with good analysis.

You understate things in your article, yes you can face imprisonment humiliation beatings and more. Once you have gained a certain level of attention however you can face false charges of a more serious nature that often involve issues that bear no relation to what got there attention in the first place. Being investigated by the IRS for tax fraud for example.

I personally was arrested three years ago for a charge that was fictitious. I was despite having great legal council convicted of that charge and spent time in prison (9 months) with a one year parole. As a result I not only lost all my professional licenses, my wife my kids and my home and three businesses, but I also lost my ability to get out my message of dissent. Until now that is .

I do not wish to go into details here but if you are interested in just how far government will go to squash disent please feel free to contact me. Also Richard I would say to you and to many others here at indymedia that one should be careful. I know I sound paranoid, sadly I do not believe I am paranoid.