The Concept of Work for Less (and what you can do to help)
long ago realized if you have an unpopular cause, you call it the opposite of
what it is. We've endured that legacy ever since.
pays better, workers may be tempted to leave their non-union jobs to get the
higher pay. Business owners know this, and some have united in the cause of
destroying unions. They have one overriding goal: higher profits for
business owners and investors, accomplished by reducing labor costs.
the National Right to Work Committee purports to engage in grass-roots lobbying
on behalf of the 'little guy', [it] was formed by a group of southern
businessmen with the express purpose of fighting unions... they 'added a few
workers for the purpose of public relations.' ... The National Right to Work
Legal Defense Foundation has received millions of dollars in grants from
foundations controlled by major U.S. Industrialists...” [from Wikipedia]
and diminished political power for working people throughout America, they have
harnessed the deception model of politicking. But this campaign isn't
just deceptive; it is dishonest, predatory, and brutal.
was passed by Congress in 1947. The percentage of unionized workers has
dropped steadily ever since. From a high of thirty-five percent organized during
the 1950s, less than ten percent of the workforce is organized today. If the
U.S. is to maintain a working class with some semblance of dignity and decent
pay, stopping and ultimately reversing this campaign is imperative.
The National “Right to Work” Foundation pushes its agenda with outrageously
false push-poll questions such as, “do you think union violence should
continue to enjoy legal immunity under federal law...?” They claim that
in the upcoming election, “Big Labor will spend over one billion dollars
in forced union dues this year attempting to buy control of Congress and the
White House.” They don't mention that in the 2004 election cycle,
corporate campaign contributions dwarfed organized labor's campaign
contributions by twenty-five to one.
order to accomplish their ultimate goal of universally lower wages for workers.
The work for less organizations guarantee anonymity to their donors,
allowing wealthy corporate executives to carry out a form of class warfare,
shielded by a wall of secrecy. The backers of Amendment 47 in Colorado -- the
current battleground state -- have violated campaign finance laws by refusing to
disclose their donor list. Even after nearly ten thousand dollars in fines,
they're still protecting contributors.
adding a twenty-third state to their list of conquests. The proponents of
Amendment 47 almost universally claim that they're not against unions, and
portray themselves as champions of workers' rights. But in Colorado,
work for less spokesperson Jake Jabs, the area's foremost purveyor
of imported furniture, let his motivation slip when he told reporters that
he wanted to “hurt the pocketbooks of the unions." [reported in Westword]
backers of Amendment 47 are able to generate outrage among working people that
might carry them to success in their effort to change the constitution.
Amendment 47 has two ostensible goals: making union membership “voluntary,” and
eliminating the requirement that workers support their union financially. Their
pitch to working people follows the formula, "don't let powerful
union bosses force you to join a union..." But this is a sham; for more
than half a century, federal law has guaranteed that no one can be forced to
join a union against their will.
called them on their false claims; they are intent upon slamming the amendment
through with an emotional wave of propaganda repeated by many voices. It is
quite a trick, selling to workers something that they already possess.
people in the bargaining unit. The first is direct services, such as negotiating
improved wages, hours, and working conditions. Unions maintain safety committees
that insure a safe working environment. They may negotiate or provide training,
or even G.E.D. and college classes.
mainstream unions have sought to aid their political allies, and punish
their political enemies. Under Beck Rights, however, no one in the bargaining
unit is required to contribute to a political campaign that they do not
be assessed a nominal fee to cover that first type of service. Amendment 47
would criminalize collection of these fees, yet would leave intact the federally
mandated requirement that unions must provide such services to non-members.
anyone who walked through the door, but a powerful “right to be insured”
organization guaranteed that no one had to pay for that insurance. If insurance
policy payments were voluntary, insurance companies would go out of business in
a matter of months.
increasingly bombarded with propaganda claiming they get nothing for their
union dues and should stop contributing. Because of the duty to represent
non-members, this agenda threatens union finances over and above the loss of
forced to join unions. The deception is so blatant that even as their advocates
lie and propagandize in Colorado, the work for less crowd admit the truth on
their national website:
"Question: Can I be required to be a union member or pay
dues to a union?
Answer: You may not be
required to be a union member. But, if you do not work in a Right to Work
state, you may be required to pay union fees... full union membership
cannot lawfully be required."
appearance as a rights organization. Some of its targets have sought to re-badge
this juggernaut as “right to work for less.” In my view this effort is laudable,
but ineffective. The moment we tolerate their use of the word “right” without
feeling a knee-jerk impulse to challenge it, we buy in to their frame of
reference, and we facilitate their dishonest emotional appeal.
“right to work,” in the media and among our allies, as inaccurate and biased. In
our own articles and letters, we should use the expression "right to work" only
when necessary to identify the struggle we're referring to (and then, always in
quotations). We should thenceforth call it what it is: not a right; not
a questionable or tarnished right; but rather, a systematic and
relentless campaign to damage unions and lower wages. It is work for
less, and nothing else.
The Colorado campaign against Amendment 47 is gaining strength, but in these
final weeks before the election it has a formidable task. Despite a buy-in from
a surprising number of sympathetic business leaders and elected officials
opposed Colorado's work for less campaign, no one knows who will win.
it becomes increasingly apparent that your paychecks, your
safety on the job, and your right to a 40 hour work week depend upon
our response. Together we must stop, and then reverse, this diabolical and
relentless attack against all working people.
and, Protect Colorado's Future